![bf3 tiltshift bf3 tiltshift](https://sfx.thelazy.net/media/smallthumb/2020/10/07/bf3_2020_09_25_21_04_17_863.bmp.png)
I think for most tasks, the 650M is probably still faster than the Iris Pro. I think for actual scene rendering, the CPU is the most important part of the laptop, so the extra CPU power is important.įor real-time 3d modeling (like rotating your 3D model on screen), the graphics card will be more important. The 2.6 ghz Ivy Bridge processor will be about 5-11% faster than the 2.0 ghz haswell one. I think I will buy the refurbished Ivy Bridge with 2.6 ghz and Geforce 650m (mid-2012 model) because: They aren't interested in spending time and money getting a better solution when ultimately dropping the dGPU is just a matter of time. That is I think one reason why some assumed the dGPU would go this time already.
![bf3 tiltshift bf3 tiltshift](https://c4.wallpaperflare.com/wallpaper/966/46/559/recon-battlefield-4-battlefield-video-games-wallpaper-thumb.jpg)
I think the mentality at Apple was it is good enough and we won't bother until iGPUs come around that allow us to dump the dGPU completely. The downside to this whole thing is that if an app needs the dGPU and only runs in the background doing nothing like Photoshop (that you didn't close) it always keeps the dGPU active.
#Bf3 tiltshift drivers#
They never managed to implement enough features in the drivers to reach equality or never managed to allow for a simple enough way for programmers to get all the necessary code inplace to switch while running. So while you can always switch to nvidia, you must reinitialize the graphics frameworks when nvidia is used so the program doesn't use api calls only supported on nvidia hardware. I assume that the implemented API for Intel is a subset of the nvidia one. They were never interested in fixing it or it was too difficult and they didn't have the confidence or they tried and failed, who knows. They never seemed to manage to unload the dGPU ones and switch back to the Intel while an app is loaded. Thanks a lot!Ĭlick to expand.It is because of the way they load frameworks. Which one would be better for my needs? Should I go for the extra battery life of the Haswell one? Or will the refurbished one be much faster?
#Bf3 tiltshift movie#
I will be using the laptop mainly for CAD architecture work: Vectorworks, Photoshop CS6, Illustrator, SketchUp, V-ray rendering with Sketchup, maybe some movie editing. They are similarly priced, but the refurbished one has a higher clocked Ivy Bridge and GT 650m, the new one has a lower clocked Haswell and Iris Pro. NVIDIA GeForce GT 650M with 1GB of GDDR5 memory
#Bf3 tiltshift pro#
Refurbished Macbook pro 15 inch (Ivy Bridge)Ģ.7GHz Quad-core Intel i7 (Turbo Boost up to 3.7GHz) So I am on the fence between these two models, one new, one refurbished:Ģ.0GHz Quad-core Intel Core i7, Turbo Boost up to 3.2GHz (Haswell) I have a different question though: because of the price, the top-end model with GT 750m is no option for me. It is interesting to see that Iris Pro might be faster in some cases than the GT 750m.
![bf3 tiltshift bf3 tiltshift](https://s3.amazonaws.com/bc_screenshots/original/173361/173361-full.png)
I have been reading the discussion with much interest.